
Choosing the right roofing material can be challenging, especially with so many products marketed as durable and long-lasting. One of the most common options for homeowners is the composition roof, built from asphalt-based shingles designed to balance cost and performance. But is this type of roofing truly the best fit for your home? Or are there stronger alternatives worth considering?
This guide outlines what composition shingles are, how they perform, where they fall short, and what alternatives can offer better long-term value.
A composition roof is a roofing system made from asphalt-based shingles strengthened with fiberglass mats and coated with mineral granules. These blended materials, or “compositions” are engineered to provide a mix of affordability, weather protection, and ease of installation.
Composition roofs have been widely used in the United States for decades due to their versatility and availability. They can suit many home styles, budgets, and climates, making them a go-to choice for roofing contractors.
Before diving into performance, it helps to understand what composition shingles are made of.
Composition shingles, also called asphalt composition shingles, consist of:
These shingles come in several categories, including:
They are designed to handle everyday weather exposure but vary in durability depending on quality and climate.
Composition shingles remain popular for good reasons. Many homeowners appreciate the balance they offer between cost and performance, especially when compared to premium materials.
They provide:
For homeowners prioritizing short-term affordability and basic weather protection, composition shingles often meet expectations without requiring major upfront investment.
Despite their widespread use, composition shingles come with limitations that may not be obvious upfront. Over time, these drawbacks can significantly affect performance, maintenance needs, and long-term cost.
Common drawbacks include:
These issues collectively lead to higher long-term maintenance costs and more frequent roof replacements, making composition shingles less cost-effective in challenging climates.

Not all roofing materials perform equally, and understanding the differences helps homeowners make informed choices.
Architectural shingles are still composition shingles, but they offer thicker construction, improved aesthetics, and longer life expectancy. They are a better mid-level option but still prone to granule loss and storm damage.
Metal roofing is more expensive upfront but offers superior durability, higher wind resistance, and a much longer lifespan. It performs well in most climates but may not suit every architectural style.
Wood shakes provide a natural aesthetic but require regular maintenance and are vulnerable to fire, mold, splitting, and insect damage. They also lack the impact resistance modern climates demand.
Synthetic roofing materials, including CEDUR, provide the appearance of premium materials without the drawbacks. They offer superior weather resistance, better longevity, and minimal maintenance.
Composition shingles do not perform equally in every region, and climate plays a major role in determining how long they last and how well they protect the home. Their asphalt-based construction makes them more sensitive to environmental stressors than many alternative roofing materials.
They often struggle in:
In areas with frequent storms, temperature swings, or prolonged humidity, homeowners often face more repairs and shorter replacement cycles with composition roofing. These climate-driven issues are a key reason many homeowners explore more durable alternatives that can better withstand extreme conditions.
If you’re considering a new roof, exploring alternatives can reveal better long-term value. While there are many roofing materials on the market, the most compelling alternative for homeowners seeking durability, impact resistance, and low maintenance is synthetic roofing.
Synthetic roofing products are engineered to replicate the look of premium materials like wood shake or slate while delivering far superior performance. They offer:
Because synthetic options blend curb appeal with advanced engineering, they have become the preferred solution for homeowners wanting better longevity and resilience than composition shingles can provide.
Within this category, CEDUR stands out as one of the most reliable and visually appealing synthetic roofing systems available today.

Among synthetic roofing options, CEDUR roofing shakes stand out for their combination of natural beauty and superior performance.
CEDUR provides:
Because CEDUR shakes combine durability with authentic style, they outperform asphalt composition shingles in nearly every climate scenario.
Composition shingles may be suitable for some homes, but their vulnerabilities in harsh climates, shorter lifespan, and ongoing maintenance needs often make them a less reliable choice. For homeowners wanting long-term durability, superior impact resistance, and lasting curb appeal, synthetic alternatives offer far better performance.
Ready to explore a roofing option built for long-lasting protection? Contact CEDUR today to learn more about upgrading your home with high-performance synthetic shakes.